Proceed to WirelessDevNet Home Page
Publications, e-books, and more! Community Tutorials Store Downloads, tools, & Freebies! IT Career Center News Home
newnav.gif

Newsletters
EMail Address:



   Content
  - Articles
  - Columns
  - Training
  - Library
  - Glossary
 
   Career Center
  - Career Center Home
  - View Jobs
  - Post A Job
  - Resumes/CVs
  - Resource Center
 
   Marketplace
  - Marketplace Home
  - Software Products
  - Wireless Market Data
  - Technical Books
 
   News
  - Daily News
  - Submit News
  - Events Calendar
  - Unsubscribe
  - Delivery Options
 
   Community
  - Discussion Boards
  - Mailing List
  - Mailing List Archives
 
   About Us
  - About WirelessDevNet
  - Wireless Source Disks
  - Partners
  - About MindSites Group
  - Advertising Information
 
Wireless Developer Network Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: Re: MobileLBSList: WAP/WML interoperable?
Date:  09/13/2000 11:36:07 AM
From:  Gould Carlson Michael

Mensaje citado por: Alistair Edwardes <aje@geo.ed.ac.uk>:

>
> >Yes, indeed OGC is *very* keen on LBS, and will need a strong
concerted
> >effort to produce and maintain lightweight specs for that
marketplace,
> >which will soon be much larger than GIS.
> >
>
> What are your feelings on the current suggested interfaces,
GetLocation,
> WhereIsIt, WhereIsItInTermsIUnderstand, BuildPathway, Who'sThere?

First, let it be said that these (OpenGIS location based services)
specs are green, and not intended to be treated as the word of God. It
was a (good) first cut effort, by Cliff Kottman.

>
> I'm not clear as to what interface they actually address. I can see
that
> GetLocation, WhereIsIt, Who'sThere are useful for a location server
but is
> it the role of a location server to provide services such as
> WhereIsItInTermsIUnderstand, BuildPathway these seem to be value added
> services.The implication is that a mobile user will interface
directly with
> a location service - I can't see the usefulness of this.

None of these specs is for end-user use.

>I guess the
> confusion lies in exactly what reference model is being used. Do see
a need
> for a formal model or do you think that it is generally aggreed and
> understood?
>

Agreed that we need one: completely understood, no.


> >> I also personally think that a deciding factor for the sucsess of
GML
> >is
> >> how
> >> soon it will support topology.
> >
> >Yes, topology is on the to-do list.
> >
>
> What about time stamps?

Donīt know. You should ask author Ron Lake <rlake@galdosinc.com> about
his/their plans.

>
> Regards Alistair.
>

Saludos,
Mike Gould



To unsubscribe, write to mobilelbslist-unsubscribe@geocomm.com
________________________________________________________________________
The MobileLBSList is brought to you by The GeoCommunity and The WirelessDeveloperNetwork
http://www.geocomm.com
http://www.wirelessdevnet.com


Sponsors

Search

Eliminate irrelevant hits with our industry-specific search engine!









Wireless Developer Network - A MindSites Group Trade Community
Copyright© 2000-2010 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy
Send Comments to:
feedback@wirelessdevnet.com